I feel extremely lucky to be working here at PMA. As a learning environment, I couldn’t have found my way into a warmer, more positive place. Everyone is incredibly helpful and I have been amassing information every day.
At the moment I am mostly getting up to speed on the projects that I will be working on. Having read the notes for the Year of the Plague, one of the tasks I have been asked to perform is archiving the photographs and still visual materials for this project. A rather large and potentially tedious task, this has actually been intriguing as despite the clerical mundanity of filing photographs and labelling files, I get to see what Montreal was like in the late 1800s, and have already learned a lot about the city and the way in which people lived, interacted and thought a hundred years ago. Further, I have been researching smallpox, and by doing shot lists of various documentaries and AV materials from the BBC and ABC, I am getting a good idea of what would happen in Montreal (and Canada and the world) if there was an outbreak of smallpox or some sort of biological warfare with the aim of an epidemic. Plus I’ve learned a whole lot about a disease that I knew hardly anything about.
The other project that I will be working on, and have hence been reading up on is the Extraordinaty Canadians biography that we’ll be doing on Nellie McClung. I knew so very little about her but it turns out that she is a most exceptional woman who is arguably the most influential woman in Canada and most certainly had an incredible effect on the way that women are viewed in Canada. If it hadn’t been for Nellie’s gift for public speaking, sense on humour and absolutely relentless sense of morality and equality, Canada would very likely be a different place from the country it now is.
What’s so inspiring about Nellie is that she lived her life in the way that many women now see their roles. She believed in women and saw no reason why women shouldn’t be able to run the world just as well (she often argued, better) than men. Her style of feminism was not anti-male, but rather pro-female, and pro-family and Christian values. She drove to raise the standards of living for women, and avidly sought to improve the standard of living and rights of women immigrants and those unprotected by the law or family. Her avid prohibition stance was a result of the alcoholism and dissolution of families and morality that she saw in her native Manitoba, and then later Alberta and BC, and looking at the statistics and changes that took place in these parts of Canada when liquor was outlawed, seems to have done a great deal of good for the region, and especially for the quality of life of the women living the in prairies.
As she grew older, she became a more and more prominent public figure, and she rallied behind other causes. Whenever she witnesses social injustice, she made a fuss, and the simple presence of her voice alerted many Canadians to another side of the story — a side that might have been easy to ignore but would not remain unheard because of this firebrand of a woman.
Now that I have read about her, I will be working with the director on the film. I don’t know what I’m going to be doing yet — and of couse I will have to meet her first — but I’m super-excited to work on this film and learn more about this woman.

















